Important Note!

This site is a mirror of Phil's old site at dvrbs.com. and is generally not maintained.

For a modern experience, including mobile, please check out: https://camdenhistory.com.

L. Scott Cherchesky

Camden Lawyer

L. Scott Cherchesky

Portrait of L. Scott Cherchesky

L. Scott Cherchesky

L. SCOTT CHERCHESKY (the “L” stood for Louis) was born overseas around 1904. He was a prominent lawyer in Camden from the 1920s until his death in the late 1940s. The 1929 Camden City Directory shows him living on Garfield Avenue in Collingswood NJ, with offices in the Wilson Building, then called the West Jersey Trust Building, at Broadway and Cooper Street.

In 1937 he sailed to Europe, returning aboard the steamship Ile de France at New York on April 21, 1937, having sailed from Southampton, England.

The 1947 City directory shows that he was still living on Garfield Avenue Collingswood, and that his offices were still in the Wilson Building at Broadway and Cooper Streets. He passed away shortly thereafter.

Advertisement

Girl's Screams Win Brother Clemency

Camden Courier-Post

Girl's Screams Win Brother Clemency — Camden Courier-Post February 22, 1928 Girl's Screams Win Brother Clemency (continued)

Judge Imposes Fine on Youthful Burglar After Her Mercy Plea

Piercing screams of a young woman that threw the Camden Criminal Court into disorder resulted in the changing of a three-months sentence imposed on her brother to a small fine.

The brother, Thomas Bradley, of Somerdale, and a friend, Joseph Pughia, of Magnolia Heights, had pleaded “non vult” to charges of breaking, entering and larceny, and were arraigned before Judge Shay yesterday afternoon for sentence. When the court imposed jail sentences of three months on each of the youths, Mrs. Florence Doris, of Somerdale, sister to Bradley, rose to her feet in the courtroom and hysterically screamed.

“Don’t send my brother to jail!”

Her screams were followed by convulsive moaning and sobbing and court attendants were obliged to lead her from the courtroom. Scott Cherchesky, counsel for the two youths, pleaded for leniency for the sake of the sister, while Samuel Campbell, proprietor of the Magnolia Heights poolroom which was robbed of a radio and battery by the two defendants, also recommended leniency. Upon a motion by Assistant Prosecutor Varbalow, the two boys were brought back from the cells to the court.

“The complainant in this case has recommended mercy,” stated the court. “I believe you stole these articles to annoy him, rather than to really steal. However, breaking and entering and robbery is a very serious offense, one for which you could serve seven years. However, on application of this complainant, I will reconsider sentence, fine you $75 each and place you on probation for one year.”

Keown Named Head of County G.O.P. as Wallworth Resigns

Camden Courier-Post

Camden County Republican Committee reorganization, June 25, 1929

Mrs. Verga Re-elected Vice Chairman at Reorganization Meeting of Committee

OTHER OFFICERS CHOSEN

When the Camden County Republican Executive Committee reorganized last night Walter S. Keown was elected chairman without opposition.

He succeeds former State Senator Joseph F. Wallworth, who was Republican county chairman six years, and a member 12 years. At a dinner preceding the executive session a silver set and a vase were presented to Wallworth by the committee. The retiring members of the committee received bronze elephants as emblems of the party.

At the executive session Mrs. Elizabeth Grotty Verga was re-elected vice chairman; Harry C. Sharp, treasurer; William D. Sayrs, assistant treasurer; Howard B. Dyer, secretary, and Mrs. Laura Silbers and Mrs. Lottie Stinson, assistant secretaries. Harold W. Bennett, Edward R. Diebert, Bernard Bertman, L. Scott Chercesky, Carl Kisselman and Frank Voigt were chosen solicitors.

Wallworth Reviews Work

Upon retiring as chairman Senator Wallworth said:

During the six years I acted as your chairman considerable political history has been made in our county. The Republican party was on the rocks and loyalty seemed to have drifted away when Frank Patterson, Al Matthews, Penn Corson and Senator Baird begged me to take the chairmanship. In doing so I quickly discovered I had undertaken one of the hardest up hill battles of my life.

When Keown took over the gavel he pointed out to the committee members they were political leaders of their districts. He said it was their duty to find out the cause of unrest.

“In some of your districts the trouble is your tax rates are too high,” said the chairman. “High taxe rates are an evil and it is your duty to find the cause and remedy the situation. When there is a spirit of satisfaction in your district there is satisfaction throughout the county.”

Wolverton Favors Plan

Congressman Charles A. Wolverton complimented the new chairman on his advice. Sharp and Sayrs, who have been identified with the committee more than 20 years, were also speakers.

Keown then turned the gavel over to Mrs. Verga, who thanked the committee for her re-election. She introduced Mrs. Silbers and Mrs. Stinson, who urged loyalty and work on the part of the women members of the committee.

Keown was nominated by Daniel Silbers, Pennsauken township. Colonel George L. Selby nominated Sharp and Dyer. All of the officers received a unanimous vote.

Ten new members took seats from the five boroughs recently created out of Clementon township. Among them was Clinton L. Bardo, president of New York Shipbuilding Corp., who was elected from the new borough of Pine Valley last Tuesday. Twelve members of last year’s committee retired either as a result of the primary election or not being candidates.

Baird to Address Hebrew League

Camden Courier-Post

David Baird, Jr., Republican nominee for governor, will make his final appearance in the current election campaign Monday night, in his “own home town,” when he will address a monster rally at the Hebrew Republican League, at the Talmud Torah, 621 Kaighn avenue.

The Hebrew league reorganized formally at a luncheon in the Hotel Walt Whitman. Lewis Liberman, assistant city solicitor, was elected president; Sig Schoenagle, Samuel Shaner, Israel Weitzman, vice-presidents; L. Scott Cherchesky, secretary, and Samuel Label, treasurer.

Trustees of the league include Hyman Bloom, Mitchell E. Cohen, Benjamin Friedman, Jacob L. Furer, Isadore H. Hermann, Carl Kisselman, Edward Markowitz, Louis L. Markowitz, Harry Obus, Maurice L. Praissman, Samuel Richelson, Meyer L. Sakin, Julius Rosenberg, Jacob Rosenkrantz and Jack Weinberg.

In addition to former Senator Baird, speakers at the Jewish rally will include Mrs. Elizabeth C. Verga, Republican state committeewoman and vice chairman of the county committee; Congressman Charles A. Wolverton, Congressman Benjamin Golder, of Pennsylvania, and State Senator Samuel Salus, of Pennsylvania.

Haines and Reinert Head G.O.P.; Madden To Lead Democrats

Camden Courier-Post

Haines and Reinert Head G.O.P.; Madden To Lead Democrats — June 1, 1932 Portrait of Joshua C. Haines

Joshua C. Haines, Camden county register of deeds, was elected chairman of the Camden County Republican Committee at its reorganization last night in one of the most spirited contests held within the Organization in a decade.

Mrs. Isabella C. Reinert, of Collingswood, nominee for Assembly, was elected vice chairman.

Haines succeeds Walter S. Keown and Mrs. Reinert takes the post held by Mrs. Elizabeth C. Verga.

Their election came at 11.30 p. m., after more than three hours of heated argument behind closed doors, and after former U. S. Senator David Baird and Mrs. Verga had declined to accept the offices.

Baird and Mrs. Verga Decline Posts During Spirited Committee Session

Keown, Hanna Mentioned

Others nominated were Keown and Camden City Commissioner Frank B. Hanna, for chairman, and Mrs. Etta C. Pfrommer, of the Eleventh Ward. Mrs. Pfrommer twice declined.

In previous years reorganization of the county committee had been effected without dispute, and with unanimous action by the members. Last night, however, the discussion waged long and loud.

Though newspapermen were excluded from the meeting, the voices of the debating members coming through the locked doors left no doubt as to the progress of the election.

Other officers were re-elected as follows: Howard B. Dyer, secretary; William D. Sayrs, Jr., treasurer, and Mrs. Lottie B. Stinson, assistant secretary. Mrs. Anna G. Holl, of Collingswood, was elected assistant treasurer to succeed Mrs. Reinert.

Keown opened the meeting and then Baird spoke.

The former Senator presented the recommendation of the Republican executive conference committee that the members elect Haines and Mrs. Reinert in view of the fact that Keown and Mrs. Verga had resisted all requests to continue.

Then Mrs. Margaret Wermuth, of Delaware township, and Carlton M. “Cy” Harris, of the Twelfth Ward, presented a petition signed by virtually all the committee, asking Baird and Mrs. Verga to accept the chairmanship and vice chairmanship.

Baird Declines

Baird then declared that he was unable to take over any additional work.

“I must not be chosen, but must work with and for you, and I ask that you respect my wishes.”

He then proposed that Haines and Mrs. Reinert be chosen unanimously.

Despite his proposal, Mrs. Wermuth moved the election of Baird and Mrs. Verga. The vote was virtually unanimous. Immediately J. C. Remington, Jr., of Haddonfield, moved to adjourn. The chair refused to recognize the motion.

Several members threatened to resign from the committee unless Baird and Mrs. Verga accepted. To this Baird answered:

“I’m still fighting for the party, no matter who quits. If you quit, you’re not worthy to be members.” His remarks were greeted with applause.

In announcing her decision not to accept renomination Mrs. Verga said her duties as state vice chairman, taking her into all the 21 counties, made it impossible for her to continue to devote the time to the county committee which it deserved.

Haines Finally Elected

Then Baird accepted the resignation from the chairmanship and Mrs. Verga from the vice chairmanship.

Keown was nominated for re-election, and Hanna for the chairman position.

Baird was renominated by Remington. Keown reiterated his insistence, issued some months ago, not to stand for re-election. Baird again declined.

Then Keown moved the election of Haines and Mrs. Reinert and the discussion which followed continued for three hours. Finally the vote was taken at 11.30 and Haines and Mrs. Reinert were elected.

Mrs. Reinert, however, declined the office, stating her candidacy for the Assembly precluded her at this time. Then Mrs. Pfrommer was nominated, but she turned it down twice. After much persuasion Mrs. Reinert agreed to accept the office, with the provision that she serve through the summer and that she be permitted to resign later, if she wished.

In congratulating Mrs. Reinert, Congressman Charles A. Wolverton urged the election of Baird and Mrs. Verga.

The committee elected the following solicitors: Carl Kisselman, Edward R. Deibert, L. Scott Cherchesky, William E.A. King, J. Claud Simon, T. Phillips Brown, J. H. Reiners, Jr., Rocco Palese and Morris Praissman.

Members of the Republican County Committee (continued) Members of the Republican County Committee — full list

Haines and Reinert Head County G.O.P. (Continued from Page One)

ed argument behind closed doors, and after former U. S. Senator David Baird and Mrs. Verga had declined to accept the offices.

Keown, Hanna Mentioned Others nominated were Keown and Camden City Commissioner Frank B. Hanna, for chairman, and Mrs. Etta C. Pfrommer, of the Eleventh Ward. Mrs. Pfrommer twice declined. In previous years reorganization of the county committee had been effected without dispute, and with unanimous action by the members. Last night, however, the discussion waged long and loud. Though newspapermen were excluded from the meeting, the voices of the debating members coming through the locked doors left no doubt as to the progress of the election. Other officers were re-elected as follows: Howard B. Dyer, secretary; William D. Sayrs, Jr., treasurer, and Mrs. Lottie B. Stinson, assistant secretary. Mrs. Anna G. Holl, of Collingswood, was elected assistant treasurer to succeed Mrs. Reinert. Keown opened the meeting and then Baird spoke. The former Senator presented the recommendation of the Republican executive conference committee that the members elect Haines and Mrs. Reinert in view of the fact that Keown and Mrs. Verga had resisted all requests to continue. Then Mrs. Margaret Wermuth, of Delaware township, and Carlton M. “Cy” Harris, of the Twelfth Ward, presented a petition signed by virtually all the committee, asking Baird and Mrs. Verga to accept the chairmanship and vice chairmanship. Baird Declines Baird then declared that he was unable to take over any additional work. “I must not be chosen, but must work with and for you, and I ask that you respect my wishes.” He then proposed that Haines and Mrs. Reinert be chosen unanimously. Despite his proposal, Mrs. Wermuth moved the election of Baird and Mrs. Verga. The vote was virtually unanimous. Immediately J. C. Remington, Jr., of Haddonfield, moved to adjourn. The chair refused to recognize the motion. Several members threatened to resign from the committee unless Baird and Mrs. Verga accepted. To this Baird answered: “I’m still fighting for the party, no matter who quits. If you quit, you’re not worthy to be members.” His remarks were greeted with applause. In announcing her decision not to accept renomination Mrs. Verga said

her duties as state vice chairman, taking her into all the 21 counties, made it impossible for her to continue to devote the time to the county committee which it deserved. In explaining these reasons to the vice chairman still has two years to run.

Haines Finally Elected Then Baird accepted the resignation from the chairmanship and Mrs. Verga from the vice chairmanship. Keown was nominated for re-election, and Hanna for the chairman position. Baird was renominated by Remington. Keown reiterated his insistence, issued some months ago, not to stand for re-election. Baird again declined. Then Keown moved the election of Haines and Mrs. Reinert and the discussion which followed continued for three hours. Finally the vote was taken at 11.30 and Haines and Mrs. Reinert were elected. Mrs. Reinert, however, declined the office, stating her candidacy for the Assembly precluded her at this time. Then Mrs. Pfrommer was nominated, but she turned it down twice. After much persuasion Mrs. Reinert agreed to accept the office, with the provision that she serve through the summer and that she be permitted to resign later, if she wished. In congratulating Mrs. Reinert, Congressman Charles A. Wolverton urged the election of Baird and Mrs. Verga. The committee elected the following solicitors: Carl Kisselman, Edward R. Deibert, L. Scott Cherchesky, William E.A. King, J. Claud Simon, T. Phillips Brown, J. H. Reiners, Jr., Rocco Palese and Morris Praissman.

Members of the Republican County Committee, which organized last night, follow:

Camden City (*Indicates New Member) First Ward—William H. Heiser and Marie McCready Second—James Corea and *Susie Marchiano Third—James E. Tatem and *Mary A. Ivins Fourth—Martin A. McNulty and Madeline Salvatore Fifth—Howard B. Dyer and Mary S. Hartung Seventh—Edward A. Kemble and Mary D. Guthridge Eighth—*Edmund A. Walsh and Mamie F. Piraine Ninth—Edward Holloway and Deborah Schuck Tenth—*Henry I. Haines and Lillian M. Walker Eleventh—Horace B. Beideman and Etta C. Pfrommer Twelfth—Carlton M. Harris and Mary E. Hamel Thirteenth—Henry Knauer and Louella I. Whaland Fourteenth—Jesse M. Donaghy and Lottie B. Stinson

What Do YOU Think? — This Town of Ours

Charley Humes — Camden Courier-Post

What Do YOU Think? By Charley Humes — Camden Dance Marathon, June 4, 1932

Having nothing else to do I spent most of the early hours of yesterday morning at the Camden Dance Marathon…And what I saw would fill a book…The cheaters have stopped “watching the night planes come in” and moved down a piece to the marathon…I saw a Merchantville man making lovee with a former Camden High School frau (but he needn’t worry, ‘cause his Heart was over to a dance in Philly with another guy)…Then there was that Blonde who used to be a brunette…Sitting with a chap who has several children (not the blonde’s)…Sitting at the side was the son of a Broadway man with a gal his wife doesn’t know (and was her dress yeller!)…I saw a cloak room gal from one of the better county drinkee places chinning with a man who has something to do with automobiles…Then there were those two “young” girls with gray hair who attempted to “make” all the Johns in the place…But not everyone there was on the make…There was “Scotty” Cherchesky with his flower in coat lapel…Dressed as only L. Scott Cherchesky can dress…I heard Francis Murtha, ex-punchem fella, crooning like Bing Crosby…I saw Patrolman John V. Wilkie (and his shadow) looking beneath his chair (I don’t know what for, beer or fireworks)…Adolph Powdermaker, big bail-bond impresario, chewing a piece of candy…Apparently hoping they’d pinch the outfit…Then there was Stanley Sover sitting over on the bleachers looking like he was pining for his squaw (who is vacationing now)…I saw 30 cops (one to every community for 30 miles)…Then there was that newspaperman who couldn’t take his eyes off that brunette…

Police Censured in Pickpocket Case

Camden Courier-Post

Police Censured in Pickpocket Case — June 4, 1932 Police Censured in Pickpocket Case (continued) Police Censured in Pickpocket Case (continued) Police Censured in Pickpocket Case (continued)

Stewart Reprimands Pancoast for Freeing 4—Grand Jury Refuses to Indict

Mayor Roy R. Stewart has reprimanded Police Judge Garfield Pancoast, former Acting City Detective Benjamin Simon and Captain of Detectives John W. Golden for laxity in handling the case of four alleged pickpockets and their unwilling accuser.

Meanwhile, the Camden County Grand Jury has exonerated the four accused men and also the complainant, who had been held by Pancoast as a material witness after failing to appear against the quartet in court.

The pickpocket suspects were released in their own recognizance by Pancoast and only one was rearrested after the police judge ordered the case reopened after a conference with the mayor.

Stewart acted after criticism had been made concerning progress of the case. He insisted that the defendants be brought to trial.

The men exonerated gave their names to the police at the time of their arrest as Thomas Anthony, 30, of 1112 Federal street; Harry Smith, 44, of 1338 Oxford street; Harry Miller, 29, of 629 North Tenth street, and Sam Berman, 46, of 606 West Girard avenue, all of Philadelphia.

Their attorneys at the police court hearing were Walter S. Keown and L. Scott Cherchesky.

Accused by Theatregoer

Their accuser was Charles Wilder, of 567 Liberty street, who had charged the men with taking $22 from his pocket in March as he was leaving a theatre at Broadway and Newton avenue.

The mayor said Wilder informed him, in a formal statement, that the reason he did not appear against the defendants at the original hearing was because he was more interested in getting his money back than in pressing the charges. Wilder is said to have given police the name of the man who gave him back his money.

“Wilder said he felt that if his money was returned to him there was no more to the case,” the mayor said.

“Will contempt proceedings be instituted against Wilder?” the mayor was asked.

Warrants Out for Four

“No,” he replied. “I don’t think so because we are still waiting to get the other fellows. Warrants are out to pick up the four defendants at any time.”

“Can they still be rearrested, even though they have been exonerated by the grand jury?” the mayor was asked.

“Well, that’s something you will have to ask Police Judge Pancoast,” he replied.

The quartet cleared of pocketpicking have long police records in Philadelphia.

In his formal decision yesterday, after reviewing the case, the mayor censured Simon for “failure to properly handle the case and dispose of same before the police judge”; Pancoast, for his “overzealousness in calling this case as the first of the morning” and for releasing defendants with criminal records in their own recognizance, and Golden for “not seeing that each and every member of the detective bureau was familiar with the rules, regulations, responsibilities and duties of their positions.”

“After reading all the evidence submitted in the case, I do not believe that Officer Simon has the qualifications to be assigned to the detective bureau,” the mayor said at the conclusion of his decision.

Simon, according to the mayor, failed to press the charge against the defendants in the absence of Wilder at the hearing. He also accused Simon of permitting release of the accused and with failing to rearrest them.

Notes Witness’ Absence

The mayor, other than to comment on the absence of the witness at the police court hearing, does not go further into failure of Wilder to appear after receiving back the money that had been stolen from him. The mayor said, in answer to a question, that he was concerned mainly with laxity in the case.

Mayor Stewart’s formal decision is dated May 27. He handed Judge Pancoast, Simon and Golden a copy of it the next day after conferring with each man separately.

Simon, he said, regarded the reprimand as “rather severe,” but did not attempt to shift responsibility; Pancoast explained that he heard the pickpocket case first because it is his custom to do so when defendants are represented by counsel, and Golden received the censure “graciously.” Pancoast freed the men, it was reported, after Simon testified the police “have nothing against them” and when Wilder failed to appear in court.

The exoneration of the four men charged with being pickpockets was voted Thursday when Wilder testified before the grand jury that he would not be able to identify them, Prosecutor Clifford A. Baldwin said.

The prosecutor said that although the four have long criminal records, the grand jury could not indict them on their records. Wilder, he added, had “testified fairly” that he could not identify them; therefore the no-bill was returned.

Of the men who had been arrested on Wilder’s complaint, only Miller, alias Harry Cohen, was rearrested after Judge Pancoast had reopened the case. He was held in $1000 bail in Philadelphia pending extradition after a hearing before Magistrate Edward F. Roberts.

Pancoast postponed hearings in the case several times to permit Simon and other detectives to rearrest the defendants. He also postponed the case of Wilder, whom he had held in $1000 bail as a material witness when he did not appear at the original police court hearing. The bail was fixed to assure Wilder’s appearance against the men in the event of their reapprehension.

On April 1, Judge Pancoast severely rebuked Simon for his inability to rearrest the four Philadelphians sought as pickpockets. The police judge said: “There has been a lot of criticism in this case and yet nothing has been done to apprehend the men.” Simon said he was doing all within his power in the case.

At a continued hearing before Judge Pancoast May 6, the court informed Wilder that he would be sent for by the grand jury.

“This case has been going on since March 15 and is now in the hands of Prosecutor Baldwin,” Pancoast said at that time. “He has complaints against all four of these men and they will be indicted. I shall continue your bail so that you will be sure to appear before that body when wanted.”

Text of Statement

The text of the mayor’s conclusions, after reviewing the case, follows:

“On March 15, 1932, Harry Miller, Sam Berman, Harry Smith and Thomas Anthony, all of Philadelphia, known as pickpockets, were apprehended after picking the pocket of Charles Wilder by a motorcycle policeman, William Taylor. After the arrest was made, Acting Detective Benjamin Simon was assigned to the case.

“I feel that Officer Simon should be reprimanded for his failure to properly handle the case and dispose of same before the police judge.

“The latter recommendation is based on the following facts: First, for Simon’s failure to press the charge in the absence of the witness. Second, inasmuch as he was familiar with the records of the four men, and, according to his own statement that Acting Detective George Zeitz telephoned from the Philadelphia detective bureau and gave the information that the prisoners had long records and that it would require from two to two and one-half hours to prepare a copy of the same. Third, for permitting the court to try this case as the first case in the morning, realizing the record of the men, and not requesting the judge to lay it over until he could furnish the information being furnished by the Philadelphia bureau. Fourth, that Officer Simon carried in his pocket for several days the necessary warrants to arrest these men after they had been released in their own recognizance and the very weak statement from him that he hoped to have the men surrender without extradition being necessary. I feel that it was preposterous to believe that criminals of this type would be lured into any such scheme. Fifth, that Officer Simon should have made the charges against these men instead of leaving the matter to Judge Pancoast. Sixth, for Simon’s unwillingness to sign the statement which he gave to the detective bureau.

Censures Pancoast

“Judge Pancoast should be reprimanded for his overzealousness in calling this case as the first of the morning. Certainly, four men arrested as pickpockets should not be swept aside and released without holding them until their complete record could be obtained. Judge Pancoast realizes that we are not inviting criminals of this type to our community, and the rougher we treat them the fewer we will have in our midst. He certainly should not release men with criminal records, such as these, in their own recognizance.

“Captain Golden should be reprimanded for not seeing that each and every member of the detective bureau was familiar with the rules, regulations, responsibilities and duties of their positions, as in this case it was very evident that Detective Simon did not show any of the aforesaid qualifications. I also believe that in cases of this nature that Captain Golden should make sure that the complaining witness would appear in court and that the court be instructed to hold the men until they had a complete record of them. To my mind, the laxity in any department is and should be placed directly on the man in charge, in this instance, the captain of detectives.

“After reading all the evidence submitted in this case, I do not believe that Officer Simon has the qualifications to be assigned to the detective bureau.”

Commenting on the no-bill exonerating the men accused by Wilder, Prosecutor Baldwin said:

“The man who had his pocket picked (Wilder) appeared before the grand jury Thursday. He was very fair about it and he said he could not identify the men who were arrested as the ones who picked his pocket because the moving picture theatre, where he said he was jostled, was dark. When the grand jury heard this testimony, it returned a no-bill.

Jostled in Theatre

“It is true that these four men who were accused have criminal records, but we cannot indict them on that. Wilder said he was brushed against in the aisle of the theatre as he was putting on his overcoat. When he reached the sidewalk, he said he saw an automobile pulling away. He testified that he did not know how long the men had been in it when they started off, but that he automatically jotted down the license number of the car. However, when we questioned him as to whether there was any possible way he could identify them as the men who picked his pocket, he said ‘No, because it was dark in the theatre’.”

Wilder, on March 23, was reported as having identified Miller as the man who picked his pocket and said the others jostled him as he was leaving the motion picture theatre. He saw the four men leave in a car, he told Policeman Taylor. The policeman chased the car to Broadway and Federal streets and arrested the occupants.

Employee Charges E. C. Cades With Attempt to Kill

Camden Courier-Post

Apartment House Owner Held Under $500 Bail on Man’s Complaint

ACCUSATION IS DENIED

Edwin C. Cades, 26, one of the owners of the Cades apartment houses in North Camden, was held under $500 bail yesterday pending grand jury disposition of a charge that he assaulted an employee in an attempt to kill him.

His accuser is Walter Devlin, 54, of 111 North Third Street.

When asked why his employer would want him dead, Devlin testified in police court that he has two insurance policies, one for $3000 with double indemnity for death by accident and another for $1500. In both policies, Devlin declared, Cades is named as the beneficiary.

Cades did not testify yesterday, but entered a plea of not guilty.

Devlin was found unconscious at Nineteenth street and River road late at night on May 16. Taken to West Jersey Homeopathic Hospital, he was found to have suffered a fractured skull and broken jaw. Police at first believed he was a hit-run victim but nevertheless, City Detective Edwin Mills was assigned to investigate the case.

Devlin testified yesterday that Cades invited him out for an automobile ride, alighted somewhere to look at a soft tire. Devlin asserted he found the tire to be hard and was getting back into the car when something struck him on the head. That was all he remembered, he said until he regained consciousness in the hospital.

He could not positively say that Cades was his assailant, but asserted that no other person was present.

L. Scott Cherchesky, attorney for Cades, said he had a statement obtained by Cades from Devlin in the hospital on May 17 in the presence of Detective Mills. In the statement, Devlin purportedly asserted that Cades did not attack him and he did not know who his assailant was.

Tells of Affidavit

Cherchesky also had two affidavits from tenants in the same apartment house where Devlin resides. They are William H. Dougherty and William Widerman. Dougherty attested he saw Cades return at 8.30 p. m. with Devlin and the latter went into the house, “mumbling drunkenly.” Widerman also added that at about 9:45 a. m., he saw Devlin leave the house, alone.

Devlin declared he did not remember making any statement in the hospital to Cades, but that a nurse told him “later, when I came out of my daze and the room stopped swirling,” that he had made such a statement.

The accuser’s complaint charges Cades with assault and battery with intent to kill by beating him over the head with a blunt instrument.

Cherchesky objected to Detective Mills testifying, demanding that Devlin go on the witness stand.

“I’ve been working for Cades for 13 years,” testified Devlin. “On the evening of May 17 at about 7 o’clock Mr. Cades called for me to take a ride with him in his car. We rode around the city in circles and while we were passing over a rough road somewhere Cades told me he thought he had a soft tire. He got out of the car and looked at it and then told me to get out and come around and help him fix it.

“I looked at the tire, felt it and it was hard. I told Cades it was all right. As I started to get back into the car, I was struck over the head and that is all I remember until I woke up in the hospital.”

Under questioning by Judge Pancoast, who held a statement given earlier to the police by Devlin, the latter said that Cades bought him a bottle of whisky on that night. He asserted it was his job to collect rents and take care of the apartments in the North Camden section and as pay he received an apartment and food gratis.

Did Not See Assailant

Devlin said he could not positively swear that it was Cades who struck him as Cades was behind him. He declared, however, that he saw no one else in the immediate vicinity and no one else was in the car.

“Why did you say in this statement which you gave to Detective Mills that you thought Cades positively struck you?” asked Judge Pancoast.

“Because there was no one else there,” declared Devlin.

“Why would Cades want to strike you or kill you?”

“Because he is carrying a big insurance policy on me and has been for two years,” responded Devlin. “One is a $3000 policy with double indemnity for accidental death, and the other is a $1500 newspaper policy.

“In both of them Cades is named beneficiary.

Planned to Retire

“The payment of the premium on the policies was to come out of the wages I was entitled to and I was to be retired in 10 years, when I was 64, and kept for the rest of my life.”

“Were you ever hurt before?” Judge Pancoast asked him.

“Yes, I was struck on the head with a brick once before and I told my wife to notify my brother immediately if anything happened to me as I thought I was in danger because of these insurance policies.”

Devlin was then cross-examined by Cherchesky and admitted that several months ago he had been beaten by a son-in-law and on another occasion was struck by a man named Conway.

Cades in a statement he requested the Courier-Post to publish after his arraignment in police court, emphatically denied the charges made by Devlin.

“I took Walter Devlin out in my automobile, as had been my custom, at 7 o’clock and took him home at 8 o’clock on the night of May 16. William H. Dougherty, who lives in the first-floor apartment at 111 North Third Street, saw Devlin get out of the car and walk up to his apartment, and has signed an affidavit to that effect, which I have.

“William Widerman, who also lives at the same address, saw Devlin in his apartment that same evening, and also saw him leave the apartment about 10 o’clock that night, and has given me a signed affidavit to that effect.

“I did not see Devlin until the next morning when I was called to the hospital by detectives. I cannot account for Devlin’s whereabouts after I left him at the apartment house at 8 o’clock.

“I voted at 8:30 at the polling place at Cooper School, and after that spent the evening with my family. This case appears to me as one of extortion by either Walter Devlin or some other interested party.

“Devlin has been working for me for the past 13 years, and our relations have been extremely friendly. I am at loss, therefore, to account for this action.”

Delaware ‘Bay Booze’ Running Hinted in Partner’s Suit on Boat Repairs

Camden Courier-Post

CHARGES HE SPENT $6563 TO CONDITION 55 FOOT LAUNCH

‘Dapper Don’ Collins’ Liquor Skipper Testifies in Camden Case

JUDGE ORDERS BRIEFS

Inklings of Delaware Bay rum-running crept into an admiralty suit yesterday in U. S. District Court when Reynold O. Gilkes sued to recover $6563 he alleges he spent on conditioning a 55-foot gasoline launch.

The suit was directed against John Henderson, formerly of Bivalve, now of 5110 Market street, Philadelphia. Henderson denied the boat, now known as the “Kashagwigamog,” was ever used in rum-running. He admitted it formerly was known as the “Helen Elizabeth.”

The boat was captured by coast guards in February, 1931, and Henderson and two companies were arrested as rum-runners. He is alleged to have “jumped” bail and was fined $500 in Cape May County along with his skipper mentioned as Allen.

Harry Henderson, a brother of John, who admitted on the stand that he was convicted of a liquor law violations, was one of the principal witnesses. He formerly was skipper of “Dapper Don” Collins’ famous rum boat “Nomad.” Collins is an International confidence man.

Harry testified that his brother was arrested in 1931 by coast guards for a liquor violation and fined $500 in Cape May County. He said the skipper of the “Helen Elizabeth,” named Allen, was fined.

He said his brother owned one-third interest in the “Helen Elizabeth,” Gilkes one-third and Charles Spinnelli, Camden, the other. He testified that he met “Babe” Sugarman in Spinnelli’s “office” at Thirty-eighth and Chestnut streets, Philadelphia, to arrange a loan of $1000 to pay the fines. He said his brother agreed to sign over his share of the partnership in the boat as collateral for the loan.

Both brothers admitted Sugarman never was repaid and he seized the boat and sold it. After passing through three other owners, it is now back in the possession of John Henderson, he admitted.

Harry Henderson was acquitted of a charge of arson in Cumberland County on May 23, 1932, in connection with the burning of a shucking house of the Planters’ Oyster Company at Port Norris.

Gilkes said he spent $6563 on repairs and reconditioning the boat. He denied it was ever used as a rum-runner and that he lost his share in it when Sugarman sold it. Gilkes produced a number of bills which he said he had paid for repairs. He admitted he was treasurer for the three owners. Henderson declared there was no agreement between the partners as to repairs.

Judge John Boyd Avis instructed the attorneys, L. Scott Cherchesky representing Gilkes, and Willard M. Harris for Henderson, to file briefs.

U.S. Court Awaits Wallace Affidavit

Camden Courier-Post

Counsel at Tax Trial States ‘Blondy’ Is Ill—O’Donnell Pleads Guilty

When counsel for Charles Edgar “Blondy” Wallace failed in U.S. district court here yesterday to produce an affidavit to the effect that Wallace was in a hospital and unable to respond to the charge of evading income tax payments, the government made protest.

Carl Kisselman, attorney for the one-time University of Pennsylvania football player and coach, declared earlier in the day that Wallace was in a Connecticut hospital undergoing treatment for diabetes. Kisselman was told to produce an affidavit to that effect for the afternoon session of court.

When the affidavit failed to arrive Judge John Boyd Avis postponed the case indefinitely over the protest of Assistant U. S. District Attorney Isadore S. Worth, who said the government had gone to considerable expense to have 50 witnesses ready to testify, asked that the action be continued through the day, pending some word from hospital authorities.

Wallace was one of four men whose cases were before the court yesterday on the same charge, income tax dodging, as a result of seizure of books and effects of the Egg Harbor Brewery and revelations made through the records, according to government investigators. The alleged evasions were in 1929 and 1930.

Worth contended that Wallace already had been given many “breaks” and that action must be had forthwith. Kisselman admitted that he had no authority to enter a guilty plea for his client, but said that was admittedly what the plea would be.

The others whose names were called to enter pleas to indictment were Edwin N. O’Donnell, 50, president of the Egg Harbor Beverage Company, operators of the now closed Egg Harbor Brewery; James J. Curran, 45, of 436 Liverpool Avenue, Egg Harbor City, and William C. Muller, 49, also of Egg Harbor.

All four were indicted following seizure of the books and records of the Egg Harbor Brewery which disclosed, according to the government, income tax evasions in 1929 and 1930.

O’Donnell, son of former Postmaster James O’Donnell, of Hammonton, was accused of evading payment of $11,258.86 in 1929 and $24,474.66 in 1930.

Represented by former Judge William A. Carr, of Philadelphia, and Charles H. McCarthy, Washington, D. C., attorney, O’Donnell retracted a plea of not guilty to one of guilty.

The change came following a conference between Carr, McCarthy and Worth, who asked that an indictment of perjury be nolle prossed. Bail was continued at $5000 while, at the request of counsel, sentence was deferred to a date to be fixed by Worth.

Wallace is accused of evading payment to the government of $4196.72 in 1929 and $1953.52 in 1930.

Curran, indicted with the others, was represented in court by L. Scott Cherchesky. In the morning he entered a plea of not guilty and action was held up pending the arrival of a copy of the indictment from Trenton. Curran is accused of evading payment of $195.63 in 1929 and $785.24 in 1930. Cherchesky entered a guilty plea for his client in the afternoon and sentence was continued pending application to the government for a compromise payment. Curran’s bail was continued at $3000.

Muller’s action, through his attorney, Mark F. Casselman, was similar. He entered a not guilty plea in the morning, pending arrival of a copy of the indictment. Muller was accused of evading payments of $1204.04 in 1929 and $135.89 in 1930, as allegedly revealed in the brewery records. Muller entered a guilty plea in the afternoon, and his bail, $2000, was continued with sentence pending settlement.

Is Zat So!

Gordon Mackay — Camden Courier-Post

Is Zat So! By Gordon Mackay — June 10, 1938 Is Zat So! (continued) Is Zat So! — Albany Setting Beg Bigswindle Is Zat So! — Took $15,000 From the Chump Is Zat So! (continued) Is Zat So! (conclusion)

DAPPER and entertaining, my legal friend, L. Scott Cherchesky, as a barrister has had considerable experience with the genus criminis, or crook to you, my dear sir. Mr. Cherchesky also figures that no crook or smart guy exists in the flesh who doesn’t at some time or other in his career meet Mr. Wiser Guy.

In support of this theory Scotty spun a fanciful tale the other day. It shows that Barnum’s trenchant observation that “the public likes to be fooled,” and the sage words of the guy who opined “there was a sucker born every minute and another one to take him,” are still hitting the high brackets.

Scotty, it seems, was retained to defend a blue sky operator whose cases still are pending. This same gentleman with the attorney plans and the lack of mazuma to carry them into effect, is charged with fleecing victims in Camden, Philadelphia and many of the South Jersey way stations.

This modern Barleyvino was through oil wells, the juiciest morsel that swindlers hold out to suckers. In his flights through frenzied finance, Mr. Client, according to Scotty, only hit one of the rackets of business, which is still a goodly sum even if you don’t have it.

Adept in luring the gold from the pockets of the chaps and milades who would get rich speedily, by this man. They did get the flash before one of the hoariest, most exploited and commonplace swindling games in the ken of detectives—the old wire-tapping stunt.

And Mr. Alleged Blue Sky Operator, who had wooed 15 million bucks from various pockets, sunk 15 G’s, as the wasp-waisted lads about town say, or expressed in clearer English, $15,000. He also had a good man who had listened to a radio.

ALBANY SETTING BEG BIGSWINDLE

“I’ll start at the end of the story and work right,” said the attorney. “This client of mine outlined to me how certain stockbrokers he knew had obtained wire service whereby they could get the returns from the race tracks three minutes before the results were flashed over the legitimate wires.

“‘They want me to take a flyer on the thing,’ this client told me. He outlined the old stuff. I said to him: ‘All right, how much did this cost you for?’ He turned a little red and answered: ‘They got me for 15 G’s.’ And this is how it came about.

“‘His stock broker friend explained that the sucker was counsel in all about the wire service. He also told my friend that he would have to go to Albany, as the boys didn’t want to play around New York. My client went to Albany and made contact with the man he was to meet.

“‘The stock broker friend had fed my client plenty of baloney that these chaps were big boys and didn’t play with pikers. They were the good clean sort and my client was urged to get the entire 15 G’s on the first tip given to beat the races fast.

“‘My blue sky pal went to Albany, immediately got in contact with the steerer for the outfit. This worthy told my client to remain in his hotel and to keep his eye on the ticker in the room. My client wanted to play safe, so he said he would bet $500 on the first horse that was given to him.

“‘Oh, Sucker Boy’—really the name of my client. The wise ones collect his 15 G’s. He fades into the cold world.

“‘It isn’t until he buys a newspaper later that he discovers no such horse as ‘Sucker Boy’ ran in the race and he was taken for 15 G’s.

TOOK $15,000 FROM THE CHUMP

“Naturally this win made the sucker who was my client feel that everything was on the up and up. So they baited the hook a little fatter for him the next time. He was allowed to bet 10 smackers. Meantime, the stock broker who had put my client wise in the first place told my client not to monkey with piking bets, but to slap down the whole 15 G’s.

“My client tried to follow this advice, but the wise guys running the racket would only take 100 berries. The horse came in ahead and paid even money. By now my client was hooked in the gills, like a sucker right from a hick hamlet. Even worse for that matter.

“They jerked him around for a week or more, let him visit the backroom of a ‘classy’ suburb where they were running the racket and greasing the ways for the big killing. This time the 15 G’s could be laid on the line.

“‘Now mark you that wire service racket. They did get the flash a minute or two before it was made official and posted. So my client takes his $15,000 and lays it on the horse he is given. His horse goes in. The others go to Sing Sing for stretches, too.

“‘He gets a run for it, all right. The chap who is announcing the race—you know the old stuff of McGinnis comes into the stretch leading by two lengths, all the old racetrack patter—has my client’s horse pulling right on the bit.

“My client starts to wonder how long this has been going on, when bango! the operator yells ‘Flash! Sucker Boy disqualified for fouling.’ Sucker Boy isn’t the same name of my client. The wise ones collect his 15 G’s. He fades into the cold world.

“It isn’t until he buys a newspaper later that he discovers no such horse as ‘Sucker Boy’ ran in the race and that he was taken for 15 G’s.

“Now comes another payoff. My client finds out under the delay. He offers to be reasonable if the guys will pay him back his dough. It’s no dice. So we have the gang arrested, for my client knows the members. One of them, the boss man, gets five years, the others go to Sing Sing for stretches, too.”

“Interesting,” I told Scotty, “and probably they’ll have company soon. I guess you don’t need any flash on that race, do you?”

Court Frees Cherchesky in Ruling Against Wire Tapping

Camden Courier-Post

L. Scott Cherchesky, Camden lawyer — February 12, 1938

Interstate Telephone Calls Forbidden as Evidence in Rum Ring Case

U. S. ATTORNEY MOVES TO QUASH INDICTMENT

L. Scott Cherchesky, Camden lawyer, described by Federal agents as the “brains” of a $20,000,000 illegal rum ring, was discharged in U. S. District Court yesterday because evidence against him was obtained by interstate wiretapping.

Quashing of the indictment was asked by the Government itself, and followed filing of a motion by Benjamin M. Colder, former congressman and counsel for Cherchesky, for dismissal on grounds that telephone calls noted as evidence against the Camden lawyer were not his calls but calls made to clients at his office, and of which Cherchesky had no direct knowledge.

Cherchesky was one of 97 men and women indicted last August as principals in an illicit liquor ring, and charged with conspiracy to swindle the Government out of $20,500,000 in liquor taxes since 1934. Agents estimated the alleged ring supplied 5,000,000 gallons of illegally distilled liquor to markets in Camden, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington and other large Eastern cities.

The United States Supreme Court has decided evidence obtained by intercepting conversations between persons in different states cannot be used in federal prosecutions.

Most of the evidence against the alleged ring is said to have been obtained by tapping of wires to Cherchesky’s office in Camden. Quashing of the charges against Cherchesky was moved by United States Attorney J. Cullen Ganey, with assent of Federal Judge George A. Welsh.

Charges against Cherchesky and others were made by Federal alcohol tax agents under Edward C. Dougherty, district supervisor for Pennsylvania. He charged members of the ring conspired with Cherchesky in the lawyer’s office.

With filing of the dismissal motion for the Camden lawyer, trial of all others indicted was held up pending decision by the Circuit Court on whether “intrastate” as well as “interstate” wire tapping is forbidden.

Cooper Hospital

Camden Courier-Post

L. Scott Cherchesky — Cooper Hospital, July 26, 1941

L. Scott Cherchesky — Cooper Hospital

Advertisement

Comments